Skip to main content

Reconstructing the Melilla Massacre

USE CASE
📖1 min read

Introduction

Organization: Lighthouse Reports

View Investigation

PhotomatchPhotomatch
Base ModelBase Model
DEM & Repeating Patterns
Modular Pieces
Shading errors & instances
Photomatch

Observations (likely)

  • Repeating parts: a lot of repeating parts.
  • Barbed wire: difficult to model by hand — likely procedural, modular, or a combination of both.
  • Fences: same logic. The parts and chain links would likely be procedural, fitted into a single fence piece, then instanced (linked copy) across the scene.
  • Lamp posts: same approach — linked instances of a base model placed across the scene many times.
  • Building: simple geometry, with either shading errors or missing faces.
  • Terrain: modeled on top of a digital elevation map (likely exported from QGIS), or modeled flat first and overlaid with the DEM afterward.

Summary

This case demonstrates terrain-from-DEM and procedural/instancing-heavy modeling — where efficiency comes from building one modular element and instancing it across the scene rather than modeling each instance by hand.